They Take Our Jobs! by Aviva Chomsky
As I’ve been doing interviews and talks over the past several months about my book, "They Take Our Jobs!" And 20 Other Myths About Immigration, I’ve become more and more convinced that a key, central issue that’s hampering those of us who support immigrant rights is the absence of a basic, fundamental ability to say “immigrant rights are human rights.” No politician or talk-show commentator is going to risk saying this—but we have to.

Although I stand by my arguments about the myths I try to deconstruct in the book (Immigrants DON’T take American jobs! Immigrants DO pay taxes! Immigrants ARE learning English!) I also, deep down, think these arguments miss the point. Immigrants are human beings who have arbitrarily been classified as having a different legal status from the rest of the country’s inhabitants. The only thing that makes immigrants different from anybody else is the fact that they are denied the basic rights that the rest of us have. There is simply no humanly acceptable reason to define a group of people as different and deny them rights.

How can we claim to oppose discrimination based on national origin when our entire body of citizenship and immigration law is founded on discrimination based on national origin?

When people ask me "why don’t they just apply for citizenship?" or "why don’t they just come here legally?" they are betraying a fundamental ignorance of our immigration and citizenship laws. People don’t apply for citizenship, or don’t obtain proper documents to come here, because the law forbids it. That’s right: the law forbids them to come here or to apply for citizenship. U.S. immigration law is based on a system of quotas and preferences. If you don’t happen to be one of the lucky few who falls into a quota or preference category, there is basically no way to obtain legal permission to immigrate. And if you are already here without proper documentation, you will never, ever be allowed to apply for citizenship.

Given the choice, nobody would risk his or her life walking through the desert to enter the country illegally, and nobody would risk the constant fear, discrimination, and threat of deportation that comes from being undocumented. Of course everybody who comes here would rather enter the country legally, and everybody who is undocumented would rather be documented. If only the law allowed them to do it!

We had it right back in the 1980s when we insisted that "No human being is illegal." If discrimination on the basis of national origin is illegal, then we need to acknowledge that our immigration laws are illegal. Human rights—including the right to be recognized as a person equal to other people—apply to everyone: no exceptions. Let’s admit that our discriminatory laws are unjustifiable. Let’s abolish the category "illegal" and give everyone the right to exist. We would solve the problem of illegal immigration with the stroke of a pen.

Aviva Chomsky is professor of history and coordinator of Latin American Studies at Salem State College. The author of several books, Chomsky has been active in Latin American solidarity and immigrants’ rights issues for over twenty-five years. She recently wrote on Harry Potter and immigrant rights for the Providence Journal and the affects of coal mining on Colombia for the Boston Phoenix. Read reviews of “They Take Our Jobs!” And 20 Other Myths About Immigration at the Feminist Review and  People’s Weekly World.

Posted in ,

11 responses to “How to solve the problem of illegal immigration with the stroke of a pen”

  1. Steve Avatar
    Steve

    Certainly our current immigration system is cruel and unjustifiable; certainly it should change, a lot, in the direction of opportunity. I’d certainly support a huge expansion in the number of people who are allowed to come and live in the US legally, and big changes in how we enforce whatever immigration laws remain.
    I wonder what would happen if–as you seem to suggest– as of January 2009 the new Congress and the new President decided to open the borders entirely, giving to anyone without a criminal record– or, hey, to anyone at all– the right to reside permanently in the US?
    Would you implement such a policy change immediately, or by degrees?
    Would such a change be good for Mexico? for the Phillipines? For the immigrants who are already in (say), LA, both legally and illegally?
    Are there environmental costs to encouraging massive population flows, over and above the flows we have already?
    What can the US do to help make Mexico or the Phillipines a place where more Mexicans or Filipinos want to stay?

    Like

  2. Liz Avatar
    Liz

    “Of course everybody who comes here would rather enter the country legally …” I feel that is something a lot of people neglect to think about when discussing human rights issues. If there was another way, someone would take it. It’s easier to be a part of the status quo than what members of the status quo are opposed to. Illegal immigrants didn’t decide to be born where they were born, and it would make their lives a whole lot easier if they didn’t have to enter our country illegally.

    Like

  3. Avi Avatar
    Avi

    Steve–Thanks for your comment. I agree that hugely increasing the immigration flows into the U.S. wouldn’t really help anyone. But it’s not at all clear that removing immigration restrictions would result in hugely increased immigration. Until 1965 there were no numerical restrictions on Latin American immigration into the U.S.–the current wave of immigration started after the restrictions were put into place. Structural and historical economic reasons have had a lot more to do with people’s movements around the globe than do restrictive laws. Working to address global economic inequalities would be a lot more effective way to affect population movements than are laws that criminalize people for moving.

    Like

  4. Steve Avatar
    Steve

    You wrote: “Working to address global economic inequalities would be a lot more effective way to affect population movements than are laws that criminalize people for moving.”
    That seems absolutely right. Let’s start by phasing out most of our cash-crop subsidies. I’d also favor any court action that granted to INS detainees some of the rights– probaby all of the rights– we now give criminal defendants. It’s hard to imagine a federal court taking that sort of action now, but I wish it would. (I bet the Ninth Circuit would if it could– but the Supremes have unfortunately spoken.)
    It’s hard to believe that the otherwise restrictive immigration regime of the mid-1920s through the mid-1960s– the one that shut the door from Eastern Europe and made it hard for Asians to get in– allowed unlimited legal immigration from all of Latin America, as you seem to imply. This legal scholar seems to think that the INS was cruelly deporting millions of Mexicans during those years.
    Maybe you mean that there were no absolute numerical quotas on Mexicans (as there were for other nationalities), only other kinds of burdens designed to limit the number of folks who could legally get in?

    Like

  5. jer999 Avatar
    jer999

    It is sad for me to see those of you who favor the illegals.
    I’ll grant you that 30% are nice persons, and should have a chance, but (not) to get ahead of those from south of the border waiting to enter
    ‘legally’.
    All people of intelligenge can see how un-fair it is to those that want entry LEGALLY.
    Those who are Doctors, Nurses, Pilots, Engineers, etc. etc. who already are educated,speak the language, who would be an immidate asset to our country.
    The real problem is that you fail to recognize that the other 70% are nothing more than leeches.
    These are the ones who cost the American taxpayers $ 466 Billion a year for their care.
    They have already bankrupt 44 Medical institutions in the South alone.
    Americans (78 %) do (not) want to continue this burden on us.
    It is this reason we want illegals to go home. They were not invited here, they invaded!!!
    It is now time to rid our Country of these 70% but the only way to accomplish it is to rid ourselves of (all of them.)
    When this is accomplished,and the fence is built, then only those from the 30% of good workers can step in line also.
    We then rid ourselves of the 70% of freeloaders, ease the burden of supporting all of them, and
    the country can then protect our borders from this fiasco even happening again.

    Like

  6. janna Avatar
    janna

    Chomsky: “When people ask me “why don’t they just apply for citizenship?” or “why don’t they just come here legally?” they are betraying a fundamental ignorance of our immigration and citizenship laws.”
    So, jer999, what part of ignorant don’t you understand?

    Like

  7. kyledeb Avatar

    It is clear from a search of your name jer999 that you spend a lot of time spreading anti-migrant filth and lies throughout the web.
    While much of what you say has no basis in fact, the most ridiculous notion is this idea that 30% of migrants are nice people while 70% of migrants are leeches. Where did you get those numbers, anti-migrants-R-us? If you don’t have a factual basis for percentages like that you’re opinions are not even worth responding to.

    Like

  8. duke1676 Avatar

    je999,
    I often find it utterly amazing that nativist types like yourself love to hind behind the mask of “but we fully support those who enter ‘legally’” …when in fact the very people you mention in your comment; Doctors, Nurses, Pilots, etc. are just as victimized by our broken immigration system as those who pay coyotes to shepherd them across the desert.
    Ask the temporary work-visa holder who’s been waiting 10 years to re-unite with his/her spouse how just the immigration system is.
    Ask the H1b holder who can’t leave an abusive work environment for fear of having to start all over in his/her effort to get through the immigration process
    Ask the LPR who can’t bring in an aged father or mother because the wait-time for their particular country is measured in decades.
    Ask the children of mixed-status families what it’s like to have one parent always living in fear.
    There’s a reason that 45% of all unauthorized migrants are visa overstays and those who have fallen out of status …the system is so inefficient and ineffective that it is un- navigable for far too many.
    If in fact you supported the “legal path” , you would want to make it easier, not harder….you would call for increases in greencards, elimination of backlogs, realignment of quotas, …but then again, as with most nativist rhetoric, it’s true intentions are revealed in the end results they are looking to achieve, not the candy-coated platitudes offered up to mask it’s real purpose.
    As to your “statistical evidence” …I’ll go with the expert, who is published a book on the topic, over the person who’s obviously gleaned their information solely from listening to Lou Dobbs and Rush Limbaugh.

    Like

  9. jeanie Avatar
    jeanie

    I’m glad to see this book and also the comments here- makes me feel like there is some hope for the future debate about immigration in this country.
    It’s really important to emphasize the human aspect of the situation of illegal immigrants, but also I think people really resonate with economic arguments, which this book seems to address. Fact is, these folks did not “sneak in to steal jobs,” and are not “leeches,” as the anti-immigrant posters make them out to be.
    They work hard, pay taxes, and are victims of unfortunate life circumstances and a system here that at once lures them with jobs and tells them “get the heck out of here, we don’t need your types.” This is twisted, and we need to recognize the hypocrisy here before we can move on to finding solutions to allow people to BE ABLE to come legally.
    I say all this as someone whose relatives benefit from h1b and high-skilled migrant visas, so I have little to “gain” from this argument except that we cannot dehumanize people based on their immigration status.

    Like

  10. Naughten Avatar
    Naughten

    AMNESTY CONSIDERATIONS
    It is very economically advantageous to use cheap Mexican seasonal agricultural guest workers; it is very socially and economically disadvantageous to let them stay after the crop is harvested. When seasonal guest workers do return to Mexico at end of the growing season, they return with money and experience, to contribute to the development of Mexico; and each year, when a new group of seasonal guest workers comes, they are eager to work for the same low non-citizen wages. And, when they return to Mexico at end of the growing season, they do not drive down the wages of American workers, by competing for jobs in landscaping, construction, sanitation, and housekeeping; and they do not use American governmental social services.
    When seasonal guest workers come from all of the countries of Latin America, on a strict quota system, then every country benefits, not Mexico exclusively; and when they are well treated, the experience is mutually positive.
    Mexico is land rich in natural resources; what makes it so socially and economically retarded are its Mexican People; and wherever they immigrate they bring their deplorable civilization with them. It is so inferior than none of them want to return to it.
    The Mexican dream of regaining political control over Texas, New Mexico, Arizona, and California is America’s worst nightmare. Starting at all of the border towns, and spreading northward throughout America, like cancers, are thousands of deplorable Mexican neighborhoods. With each deportation America looks, smells, and sounds less like socially and economically deplorable Mexico. America is presently occupied by 12 -15 million Mexicans.
    With the deportation of all the illegal immigrants, students will again be able to get good paying summer jobs, to learn responsibility and earn their way through college; blue-collar wages will rise; border towns will not be slums; Spanish will not be a second language; crime will go down; hospitals and prisons will not be overcrowded.
    When all of the illegal aliens are deported, the Leftist Democrats and Neo-Conservative Republicans will lose millions of political supporters, and the vast amounts of money that they receive from the Mexican Lobby; and, those American businesses that exploit cheap Mexican labor will lose their illegal competitive advantages.
    No advanced civilization in the World can coexist side by side with a retarded civilization, without a great wall or fence, strict guest labor laws, and armed border guards.

    Like

  11. fatjon Avatar
    fatjon

    jer999
    so u are saying that 70% of the illegal immigrants are leeches. you are saying that they should enter the country legally. but when u apply for visa you need to have education and they are a lot more papers to fill. but the people that got education they dont want to come to united states because they got a good job where ever they are. i bet u never have been somewhere and see this people. do u think they dont want to come here legally? you crazy bro because they are going through deserts and rio grande risking everything because we never gave them a chance. the list for green card is is that long that can go from boston to california long. they will die before they even get the visa. thats why they go through deserts. you saying that they dont pay taxes or health care but they are getting paying for a job that an american would get paid 30$ in hour they only get pait 10$. with the twenty dollar difference they are paying for helthcare, tax and everything. so bro shut up and you dont even got balls to put your full name but only JER999. peace

    Like

Leave a reply to Avi Cancel reply