Today’s post is from Jane Bernstein, the author of five books, most recently Rachel in the World, a memoir of raising her developmentally disabled daughter. Her essay "Rachel at Work: Enclosed, a Mother’s Report" was included in I Love You to Pieces: Creative Writers on Raising a Child With Special Needs, edited by Suzanne Kamata. Bernstein is a professor of English and creative writing at Carnegie Mellon University and lives in Pittsburgh, PA.

Kamata As the mother of a young adult with mental retardation, nothing should make me happier than a candidate for vice president vowing that my daughter would at last have a "friend and advocate in the White House." Instead, I find myself more concerned than ever about the fate of children and adults with disabilities.

As most of us know by now, Sarah Palin’s fifth child has Down Syndrome. When Palin learned through genetic testing that her unborn baby would likely "face special challenges," she confessed that she "initially felt sad" but now that he was four months old felt "truly blessed."

Of course she loves her infant son. He’s an adorable little boy. It’s hard to find parents who don’t love their newborns –- even when we learn that our babies have disabilities. While for most of us, the grief we feel after hearing that our babies are less than perfect doesn’t abate as quickly as it did for Palin, it hardly matters, because when our tears dry, as eventually they do, what’s left is love and commitment.

I’d never known anyone with a disability of any kind before my
daughter Rachel was born twenty-four years ago, with a rare disorder
that resulted in intellectual disabilities, low vision, and other
developmental issues. This was in large part because I’d grown up in a
world in which those people were kept hidden – institutionalized, sent
away, often — as in the case of playwright Arthur Miller’s son
— expunged from the family’s history. For a long time, I wept for all
that Rachel would never be. I wept because of the way her birth would
impact her older sister and alter our family’s life. Despite my grief,
I loved my daughter – we all did. I was delighted by her, committed to
working with her, and determined to figure out who my inscrutable
daughter was so I could help her have a life that brought her pleasure.
I confess I was surprised by the fierceness of my love for Rachel just
as she was — and by my readiness to take on people or institutions –
anyone or anything that stood in her way. If I’d been the one standing
at the podium with millions watching when Rachel was four months old,
I, too, might have been fooled into thinking that my love was enough to
bring her a happy life.   

It isn’t. Adorable babies with disabilities grow up. As is the case
with most kids, they are less adorable when they reach adolescence. No
longer are they poster children, snuggled in blankets, nestled in a
doting sibling’s arms. These children — who still get lumped under the
saccharine label "special needs" despite their broad range of
interests, temperaments and abilities — begin to need what their
typically developed peers can get without help. Friends. Learning
supports. Social activities. Vocational training. A chance to live how
and where they like. In our country, hundreds of thousands of young
people with disabilities cannot get the social services that would
enable them to satisfy these basic needs and experience ordinary
pleasures.

This part of the story – the part that spans years – is infrequently
told, perhaps because it isn’t as heartwarming or reassuring as a mother
proclaiming her unwavering love. In the US, thanks to cuts in Medicaid spending,
including substantial ones for the kinds of social services that would
help young adults with disabilities have satisfying lives, the lives of
these former special needs babies, whose parents also felt "unspeakable
joy" and believed they were" truly blessed" are often bleak.

Rachelintheworld_2
My daughter Rachel grew into a gregarious young woman, with strong
desires she was rarely able to articulate and many ways of
demonstrating her frustration that I could no longer satisfy them. When
I tried to plan for her life after graduation, at which time all
entitlements abruptly end, the best I could do was put her name on a waiting list
with 20,000 others for mental retardation services such as housing. Nor
would it help to relocate, since then as now, forty-eight states had
waiting lists for the kinds of social services that would make it
possible for her to live independently.

According to the Coleman Report – State of the States in Developmental Disabilities 2008
– 991,144 individuals with developmental disabilities live with family
caregivers who are 41 to 59 years of age, 716,821 living with family
caregivers who are over sixty. Here’s another way to interpret these
figures: 1,707,965 disabled Americans, many lonely and unfulfilled,
languish at home with exhausted, aging caregivers.

Sarah Palin loves Trig. She is celebrated for making the choice to
have this baby, seen as courageous and noble. Already I have read of
another young woman, encouraged by Palin’s example, who made that same
choice. I would like to celebrate their decision the same way I would
like to be heartened by Palin’s words, because I believe that
disability is part of life. What Palin and her supporters fail to
understand is that babyhood passes in an instant. If Palin truly
believes that "every baby… has potential," she needs to spread the word
that in a democracy, we care for those who need support. We do that by
making sure that Medicaid funding is adequate and social services
available to all who need them. Republicans have consistently cut these
programs. This ticket, with Palin as vice president, has pledged to
reduce government spending, and thus continue these devastating cuts.
No "friend or advocate" for those with disabilities can make these
unconscionable pledges.

You can read more about Jane Bernstein and her daughter Rachel at www.janebernstein.net. View the trailer for Rachel Is, a documentary film about Rachel’s life by her sister, Charlotte Glynn, at the Jacktar Films website.

Posted in , , ,

19 responses to “Sarah Palin: No Friend to Children and Adults with Disabilities”

  1. Special Needs Mama Avatar

    Beautiful post, Jane. Thank you for shedding some very clear light on the issues.

    Like

  2. Frit Avatar
    Frit

    Lovely article-as well as truthful. It’s too bad, however, that Palin isn’t mentioned as an enemy to far more than just children and adults with disabilities. She’s an enemy to all women who believe that government should shut up and take their noses out of the choices we make. She is an enemy to the environment. She is mistaken if she thinks that just because she has a uterus, smart women will fall for her spin and vote for her….NOT!

    Like

  3. John Holmes Avatar
    John Holmes

    I too am very thankful that Sarah Palin kept Trig and loves him. As one who pastors a church dedicated to reaching out to and helping people and families affected by disabilities as a core value, I am deeply sensitive to the difficulties hurts and sheer exhaustions that come to families as a result of disabilities like Rachel Bernstein’s developmental disabilities. My heart and efforts to help go out to families like yours. However, I am deeply concerned that there is an easy willingness to abandon the care of disabled people like Rachel to the state that does not love and cherish citizens nor can the state do so. Individual people love and cherish people. Governments do not love people and are incapable of doing so by their very nature. I know this first-hand as my dad was for many years the chaplain of the Florida State Hospital where I was born and where I later worked. I know firsthand indignities, the hidden cruelties and abuse that government bureaucrats unintentionally allow to be perpetrated.
    The ideas of the Eugenics movement of the past century which resulted in the abuse and even extermination of many people with acquired disabilities as well as people who were considered genetically inferior. Sadly our nation is still full of People who think like Dr. Peter Singer, an ethics professor at Princeton University who advocates killing unwanted people. “Infants born with severe disabilities are ‘pre-persons,’ in his judgment, and grandmothers with Alzheimer’s are ‘post-persons.’ Dr. Singer believes that personhood is defined by an individual’s ability to make decisions, to be ‘self-aware’ or have self-consciousness.” Only humans have human rights. Thus, those who are severely-abnormal physically or mentally can receive what Nazi leaders called the “final solution,” extermination, because they are less than human. As long as there is a danger of such thinkers influencing legislation that can result in inhumane outcomes toward people affected by disabilities, I hope that power brokers in Washington are not in charge of our loved ones.
    People who live so far away in their ivory towers that they don’t give a rip, are not the ones to make life altering decisions for people with needs. When we turn human welfare over to any government, all it takes to threaten the lives of disabled people is for a few selfishly misguided voters to elect the wrong government officials who promise economic change. This is how Hitler came to power. Do not think it can’t happen again here. Many are being taught similar ideas about the worthlessness of defective pre- and post-humans. The United States does not have a decent track record in the area of esteeming the dignity of every human life.
    As for either political party cutting programs for needy people, forget it, the spending for needy people has never gone down with either Republicans or Democrats in charge. The effectiveness in using the vast resources being expended is what we all need to address. There is terrible inefficiency in really helping people whenever huge bureaucracies are administering funds. That is what needs to change so that families like yours are not paying salaries to hundreds of government employees before you ever get a dollar’s worth of help.
    By the way, I do not think that any mother with five children spanning an age range of new-born to twenty years old can be assumed to be naive about how fast babies change. She is obviously well acquainted with the frustrations and disappointed expectations of motherhood. What a demeaning dig you made. I hope you will be treated better by others than you treated her.

    Like

  4. Adriana Avatar

    Thank you for this enlightening post. My youngest sister, now 20, has cerebral palsy. I thought of my mother as I read your words about your grief, your fierce love, and the significant changes that happen as a child with disabilities grows older.
    My sister has elected to stay home with my mother for now but still needs at-home care, funded by medicaid thanks to a home companion waver through the department of human services. Without it she and my mother would have to choose between in-home care and keeping the lights on!

    Like

  5. donna winters Avatar
    donna winters

    As the parent of a 25-year old mentally disabled daughter I applaud your wonderful article and insights into the reality of raising a child with a life-long disability. My daughter is on a 1400-plus waiting list in Colorado Springs for support and comprehensive services, with little hope of additional funding either from local, state or federal agencies. I am one of those aging parents who fears my time will run out before she is taken care of.
    My daughter also was a beautiful child, cute adolescent, and loving “adult.” It was easier when she, and I were younger, but with age comes other problems and difficulties, including socialization, employment, and acceptance by the Community as a whole. When they are small and cute friends and family promise to help and support, but as they age it is a different story.
    I will not comment on Gov Palin’s ability to care for her son, but wish to point out she voted against special education allocations in Alaska, cutting 62% the special education budget in 2007. To say she is now a supporter and advocate – because of her special needs baby is not the issue, but that she was not a supporter and advocate prior to his birth is the issue. She chose not to support programs in her state, and I fear she is out of touch on how enormous an issue this is, particularly to those faced on a day-to-day basis of raising and caring for our special needs children and family members.

    Like

  6. la2fdoll Avatar
    la2fdoll

    I am not impressed by Gov. Palin having a special needs child. We all must remember that she voted against additional funding for these wonderful children. The fact that her son is a Down Syndrome child only means that as a Governor she is more able and financially capable of taking care of her son by herself and not needing the “funding” and “services” that all our babies/children/adults need when they age. At first when I saw her give her speech, I thought oh good, finally someone who will know first hand the issues and the agony and financial burdens it takes to raise a child/adult with disabilities and then the light came on. She is a Governor, makes plenty of m0ney and can have a full time live in caregiver for her little Trig. I ask you, how realistic is that for us with children with disabilities that have to mortgage, second morthgage or even sell our homes to get services for our children, who are entitled to it and deserve it as any child does.Not to mention, when they grow up and age out of the system,they are left to their own devices and it is up to us to make sure they have a fulfilled life, like they did growing up with little or no services available to them.

    Like

  7. Zoe Avatar
    Zoe

    In response to John, I was deeply offended by Ms. Palin’s use of her baby as a political foil, carting him around night after night, exposed to a multitude of germs and bright lights when he should have been in bed. If she treats her own child with so little empathy and compassion, I can only imagine how she will treat the children of others if Americans are so foolish as to choose her and her running mate in November.
    Insurance issues were not mentioned in the article or any posts that I see. The obstacles faced by surviors of severe childhood illnesses in obtaining the quality medical care they need to survive are indeed enormous. Will Ms. Palin, whose child has a high probability of having some sort of congenital heart disease, address these issues in the White House, or is she too interested in winnning a bloody, useless war?

    Like

  8. Stacey Avatar
    Stacey

    As a strong supporter of Palin, I feel sorry for those of you who do not realize what an allie she is to the everyday person with challenges in their life.
    from factcheck.org:
    Palin did not cut funding for special needs education in Alaska by 62 percent. She didn’t cut it at all. In fact, she increased funding and signed a bill that will triple per-pupil funding over three years for special needs students with high-cost requirements.
    I can comment that Sarah Palin is a do’er. She rolls up her sleeves and she gets things done. This country has suffered from too many government officials that wait for someone else to lead or until the perfect time arrives before doing anything and as a result, the USA misses out on opportunities time and time again.
    Contact Sarah and get her engaged on your side and addressing your issues. Of all the politicians, she is the most approachable of them all. She will impress you with how much she can get done.

    Like

  9. becc Avatar
    becc

    I thought this article would give me a reason to dislike Palin, but unfortunately it did not. There are many reasons to dislike Palin, but this is not one of them.
    Jane Bernstein complains that Medicaid doesn’t have the resources to take care of her daughter for her. Yes, it would be nice for Bernstein if Medicaid could take care of her daughter. It would be nice for all of us if we didn’t have to get up in the morning, go to work, or feed ourselves. In an ideal world the government would do everything for us. But what would our lives be worth if we shirked our own responsibilities?
    Taking care of Bernstein’s daughter is her responsibility, along with her family, her synagogue, her community, her tribe (to paraphrase Anne Lammott).
    There are many things that our government can do for us that we cannot do ourselves. Feeding and tending to every special needs person in America is not one of them.
    Please, if you are going to drag down Sarah Palin, use something substantial, I’m sure it will be easy to find.

    Like

  10. Deb Avatar
    Deb

    I have to agree…why is the author mad that government funds (ie. tax revenues from working adults like myself) aren’t paying for her daughter to have her dream life?
    It’s not my job to pay for your kid lady.
    I have worked w/MR in Ohio and there were plenty of group homes where people could live independently (ie. live on the dole, do whatever they feel like, maybe have a token job at the workshop). Not a bad life if you ask me.

    Like

  11. umber Avatar
    umber

    Thank you for sharing this with us. It is a perspective I had never had reason to consider.
    In regards to the person who commented that we’d all like for the government to take care of us so that we do not have to get up and work every day… No, we would not all like that. As parents we ALL worry, special needs children or no, about what will happen to our children if we die. We all want to be sure that our children have a CHANCE at survival. Our nation is large, but it is our tribe. It does no one any good to have mentally challanged people living on the streets.
    It is not just a matter of tucking money away, either. In this day it is hard for any family making under 50,000 to own a home, a car, health insurance, buy clothing for the chilren, etc. Add huge medical bills and how can you save? We need to address reality and provide for those who simply cannot do so otherwise, through no fault of their own.
    Bless you for posting this. You’ve opened my eyes.

    Like

  12. Rho S. Avatar
    Rho S.

    Wow! Your article speaks to the heart of a huge issue. THank you. I recently relocated my family and my “special needs” 20 year old to Florida. I am finding out apecial needs is pretty low on their prioty list. THanks again!
    Rho

    Like

  13. Carlos Navarro Avatar
    Carlos Navarro

    When Hillarly Clinton recruited daughter Chelsea to campaign for her, MSNBC commentator David Shuster remarked that Hillary was “pimping” Chelsea. Sarah Palin has taken the pimping to more a perverse level by carting her special-needs baby as a prop in all her public appearances. .

    Like

  14. Felipe Romero Avatar
    Felipe Romero

    If Sarah Palin is such a loving mom, so solicitous of her children’s wellbeing, why does cart them around with her in her campaign appearances all over the country? Having them for emotional support in the safety of a hotel room is understandable, but using them as props, exposing them to hecklers and potentially dangerous characters in the crowd, is tantamount to child abuse. Especially at risk is her six-month old (?) son, Trig. Babies with Downs Syndrome tend to have a weaker than normal immune system, which renders them susceptible to respiratory and other serious infections. Or is this the way pit bulls with lipstick traditionally toughen up their litter for survival in the wilds of Alaska?

    Like

  15. Laura C. McFarling Avatar

    I heart breaks after reading some of the comments posted on this site. I am the proud mother of Jack, Down Syndrome, and I’m in the same boat–husband and I, both are aging, had a stroke [however, God healed me beautifully] and we have no one to take care of our son once we’ve gone to heaven. I’ve started working on a non-profit organization (in Memphis)to raise money to build an “affordable Christian-environment home for special-need children/adults.” [www.meetup.com Memphis Parenting-Special Need Children/Adults]. If the aging parents who fear their time will run out before their special-need child will be taken care of (as the child’s name is on a long waiting lists) would like to contact me, we can form a network to build homes throughout the country.
    We can’t continue to fear and worry, we need to take action! God bless you! Join me, won’t you?

    Like

  16. giovanni carbone Avatar
    giovanni carbone

    as the father of a high functioning down’s syndrome son,who at birth ,32 years ago,was asked by the nursing staff.”where are you going to send him”?. Send him I thought?the lady from Memphis has my heart and prayers.
    She is the connection God sends to the salvation of the neurosis Jane has permeated. God Bless You and Jack.

    Like

  17. Gail Avatar
    Gail

    I work with Adults with Disabilities, I provide alternative family living for a 59 yr old man with numerous needs. he has been in the system for yrs because his parents passed away.he has been in group homes, nursing homes and several AFL homes because he requires full care, yes i am compensated , but the money is very little for round the clock care and NOW I have to worry that funding will cut!!! I care a great deal for my consumer, but i cant afford to take a cut in pay. Maybe congress should think about what will happen to these people if funding is cut!!! Dont they deserve to be happy and secure.

    Like

  18. Marla Windsor Avatar
    Marla Windsor

    I am a sister and caregiver to Marty, a 42 yr. old with down syndrome. Our parents are deceased. And for the past 15 yrs. he has been at home with my husband and I. He enjoyed school when he was of the age to attend. I am presently searching for a live-in school and work setting for him. This has been his desire!!! He receives survivors benefits, monthly. Not much to work with.

    Like

Leave a reply to Deb Cancel reply